Seattle sports, on tap daily

White Sox Are Eyeing a New Home With FIVE Seating Decks and Nobody in Chicago Is Ready For It

Chicago White Sox logo on gradient background

Written by

in

Chicago White Sox logo on gradient background
Chicago White Sox logo on gradient background — Created by the Sports On Tap desk | Source : Sports On Tap (team logos property of their respective owners)

The White Sox are absolutely done with Rate Field. That much is crystal clear as their lease winds down, and now a serious new contender for their future home has officially dropped: Justin Ishbia’s Canal Edge development company just unveiled its plans and initial renderings for “The Railyards,” a proposed new ballpark situated right across the Chicago River from The 78. This isn’t some backroom whisper; it’s a full-on public reveal from the future owner of the club.

“Splash” Homers and Comiskey Vibes, But What’s With the Seats?

So, what’s this new spot look like? The Railyards would be bordered to the north by West Roosevelt Road and to the south by West 18th Street, sitting directly west of The 78 and the new Chicago Fire stadium. Canal Street runs along its west edge. Renderings show an open roof with brickwork and arches, clearly a nod to old Comiskey Park. That’s a cool touch. The coolest part might be the right-field section, which is depicted butting right up against the Chicago River. Think about it: we’re talking about the possibility of “splash” homers, just like they see at Oracle Park in San Francisco. That’s a huge potential highlight, and home plate would finally face the downtown skyline, a long-held dream for any new White Sox park, unlike Rate Field.

However, let’s talk about the downright bizarre seating situation. The renderings show a mind-boggling **FIVE** seating decks behind home plate, and four decks running up and down the lines. Just looking at them, those higher decks seem like they’d be way more distant and steeper than even the worst seats “new Comiskey” ever dished out. That’s going to be a massive challenge to fill, no matter how well the White Sox are playing. And don’t even get me started on the “little baby ‘big screen’” beyond the center field wall. It looks like it’s 500 or even 600 feet from most of the seats, sitting on a concourse island. That thing will probably need to double in size just to serve any real purpose. What are they thinking?

The Funding Question: A Massive Hurdle

We all know new ballpark construction always comes down to the big kahuna: funding. Ishbia actually owns the land where The Railyards would be built, which is a big deal. Theoretically, he could pony up for the park’s cost himself and just ask the city for infrastructure funds. Compare that to Jerry Reinsdorf’s failed plan for a ballpark at The 78, which pretty much pushed all or most of the costs onto Chicago and Illinois. Reinsdorf pulled that trick once before, for “new Comiskey” 35 years ago. The problem is, the climate for even *suggesting*, let alone demanding, municipal support for a new ballpark is totally wrong right now. Especially when their existing structure in Bridgeport is younger than most White Sox fans. It seems like the Fire’s stadium breaking ground at The 78 pretty much killed Reinsdorf’s White Sox future there, too. This funding question could be the ultimate killer for Ishbia’s cool splash homer dreams.

The White Sox are pushing hard for a new home, and “The Railyards” is the latest, most detailed look at what that could be. But with those wild seating decks and the massive funding hurdle, this is going to be a huge, uphill battle. Keep watching this space, because the future of baseball in Chicago is far from settled.

This article was created with AI assistance and published under Seattle On Tap’s editorial standards. See our Editorial Policy.

Originally reported by Yahoo Sports.

About the author

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *