Seattle sports, on tap daily

Goodell’s ‘Plural’ Problem and Why the NFL Is Forced to Expand by Two Teams

Nfl logo on gradient background

Written by

in

Nfl logo on gradient background
Nfl logo on gradient background — Created by the Sports On Tap desk | Source : Sports On Tap (team logos property of their respective owners)

The NFL is on the absolute brink of its biggest shake-up in over two decades, folks. Commissioner Roger Goodell just dropped a bombshell, making it crystal clear that league expansion isn’t some far-off pipe dream anymore. Nope, it’s an inevitability. He didn’t just hint at one international team, you hear me? Goodell straight-up confirmed it, stating there “will be **teams** outside the USA.” That plural? It’s not just a word, it’s a game-changer. It redefines everything we thought we knew about the league’s future and puts expansion, big-time, right on the table.

No Escaping the International Stage

Think about it: the NFL hasn’t added a new franchise since way back in 2002. That’s the longest stretch in league history without bringing in some fresh blood, some new energy. And now, the Commissioner himself is opening the door wide open for growth beyond the current 32 franchises. But here’s the kicker, the real head-scratcher: Goodell’s emphasis on “teams” means either two current franchises are packing their bags and relocating internationally, or the league is about to add two brand-spanking-new teams to the roster.

Relocation? C’mon, that seems like a total non-starter in this conversation, doesn’t it? We just saw the Jacksonville Jaguars lock in a new long-term lease, and they’re already knee-deep in a massive renovation project for their stadium. Those guys aren’t going anywhere. And honestly, outside of them, there isn’t another team even remotely on the radar, not a single solid candidate, to pack up their bags and move overseas. So, if no one’s relocating, what’s left on the menu? Only one thing: expansion. And when you consider the two decades the NFL has spent carefully building its relationship with England, plus the fact that London already boasts *two* NFL-ready stadiums, the most sensible path for this international presence pretty much screams “London.” It’s not subtle.

The Two-Team Tangle Is Real

But hold on a second. Why *two* teams? Why not just dip a toe in the water with one? Well, the NFL has actually been down this road before, and trust me, they’re not eager for a repeat. Back when the Cleveland Browns made their comeback between 1999 and 2001, the league was stuck with an odd number of teams. And you know what that meant? Some poor squad ended up with a bye week *every single week* of the season. Talk about a scheduling nightmare! That kind of imbalance messes with competitive fairness and throws the entire schedule into chaos. The league isn’t going back to that mess, not a chance.

So, to maintain that perfect 32-team symmetry, to keep things even-steven and avoid all that bye-week drama, any expansion move would almost certainly need to involve two teams. Both based in London? Yeah, it’s looking like the most practical, logical play here. This isn’t just idle chatter or a rumor mill anymore, folks. Goodell spoke, and his words carry weight. The implications are absolutely massive for the future of professional football.

The biggest question mark now hangs squarely over how this double-team expansion impacts the current conference and division structure. What gets shuffled? Who moves where? Get ready, because the NFL as we know it is about to get a whole lot bigger, and we’re talking about a change that will ripple through the league’s very foundation for decades to come. This is happening, and it’s happening soon.

This article was created with AI assistance and published under Seattle On Tap’s editorial standards. See our Editorial Policy.

Originally reported by Pro Football Talk.

About the author

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *