Seattle sports, on tap daily

“I Nearly Broke My Leg,” Says Jackson, As VAR Backs Yellow Card for Botman’s “High-End Reckless” Challenge

Soccer on gradient background

Written by

in

Soccer on gradient background
Soccer on gradient background — Created by the Sports On Tap desk | Source : Sports On Tap (team logos property of their respective owners)

Nicolas Jackson felt like his leg was about to snap after Sven Botman’s tackle on Saturday, but Premier League referees’ chief Howard Webb is still backing the VAR’s call to keep it a yellow card. Seriously. The Aston Villa striker, who played through it, said after the game, “I nearly broke my leg, but anyway, it’s part of football.” Talk about a tough take on a challenge that left him limping!

The Tackle Everyone’s Talking About

Alright, so in the 18th minute of the game, Botman went in hard on Jackson. Referee Jarred Gillett saw it, called it a yellow, and described it as a “reckless challenge.” Webb agreed, even upped the ante, calling it a “high-end reckless challenge.” Botman, the Newcastle centre-back, definitely came in strong and over the top of the ball, though the contact with Jackson was reportedly with his trailing leg. Even Gillett admitted, “Even though you get a touch on the ball, it’s still reckless.” The thing is, Jackson was absolutely fuming, and who could blame him? He obviously thought it deserved a lot more than just a caution. Villa went on to win the game 1-0, thanks to a 36th-minute Johan Manzambi goal, but this specific incident is what’s still buzzing.

VAR’s “Lighter-Touch” Approach Is Front and Center

So, what happened in the VAR booth? Stuart Attwell, the VAR on duty, decided to support Gillett’s on-field yellow card. Why? Because there was “no secondary scissor action” and the contact was “not with the studs.” Webb explained this as a “lighter-touch approach” for VAR this season. He says they want the on-field ref to “have ownership of the decision and the VAR to only step in when there’s an element that’s clearly wrong.” Basically, if it’s subjective, the on-field call stands. Webb pointed out that if Attwell had seen “strong stud contact from Botman’s extended leg into the ankle or shin of Jackson, or there had been a closing of the scissor,” then yeah, we’d probably have a different outcome. But since those elements weren’t there, it stayed a yellow. It’s a “good example,” according to Webb, of how referee calls are working in the Premier League this season.

Are We Seeing a Better VAR System, or Just More Subjectivity?

This whole situation shines a huge spotlight on the state of VAR this season. After seven rounds, there have already been 21 VAR interventions in the Premier League, with nine of those being subjective calls. Compare that to just three interventions at the same point last season, with zero subjective calls. That’s a massive jump! The good news, if you can call it that, is that mistakes are supposedly down. The Key Match Incidents Panel has judged only one VAR intervention was wrong this season (Man City’s offside winning goal at Man United), and one missed an awarded penalty for Arsenal. Last season, there were four errors for missed interventions by this point. So, while we’re seeing more calls go to the booth and more of them being in that grey area, the league is arguing that the overall quality of calls is improving. But for players like Jackson, who just got out of a “nearly broke my leg” situation with only a yellow card given, you gotta wonder if this “lighter-touch” approach is really prioritizing player safety the way it should.

This article was created with AI assistance and published under Seattle On Tap’s editorial standards. See our Editorial Policy.

Originally reported by Yahoo Sports.

About the author

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *