The WNBA union, the WNBPA, just slammed the brakes on potential licensing deals for Sophie Cunningham’s infamous finger-pointing taunt image. This isn’t just a minor policy update; it’s a huge statement about how the league and its players’ association view player conduct on the court.
The Union Draws a Line in the Sand
This whole thing blew up when sports business reporter Darren Rovell posted on X that the union isn’t down with its official business partners selling the image. Front Office Sports confirmed it: the WNBPA is “prohibiting licensees” from using what they’re calling a “derogatory” gesture from Cunningham. Can you believe it? The union spokesperson laid it out, saying, “For licensed apparel, we generally do not feature or look to monetize player conduct from a confrontation between our members.” Sounds like they’re trying to keep things from getting too heated off the court with the merch, even if things get spicy during a game.
The On-Court Spark and Off-Court Loophole
So, where did this viral moment even come from? It all went down on June 22, during the Indiana Fever’s 86-77 home win against the Phoenix Mercury. Cunningham was caught pointing intensely at the Mercury’s DeWanna Bonner. That confrontation erupted when Bonner jumped in to defend her teammate Alyssa Thomas, who had just been separated from Indiana’s Myisha Hines-Allen. Both Thomas and Hines-Allen snagged technical fouls. Cunningham then suggested Bonner, her former teammate for both the Fever and Mercury, should also get a tech, and yeah, that really set Bonner off, leading to the super heated exchange.
But here’s the wild part: even with the WNBPA shutting down brand deals for official partners, Cunningham herself can still totally cash in on the incident! The union has this group licensing agreement, letting partners use player name, image, and likeness without negotiating with each individual. But if the union says no to a brand deal with one of its partners, players get free rein to sign individual sponsorships. That means Cunningham can still monetize this whole thing through vehicles like the “2K” video game series, Lids, Breaking T, and Panini. The WNBPA even confirmed, “Players are of course free to create and/or license their own product.” So, while the union’s official partners are hands off, Cunningham’s personal brand is still in play. Just remember, though, if any brand wants to rock the WNBA team logos, they need the league’s approval, not the union’s.
It’s a tricky balance for the WNBPA, right? Protecting the game’s image while also letting players capitalize on their individual fame. This whole situation definitely sets a precedent for how viral moments, especially confrontational ones, get handled in the future. It’s going to be interesting to see if we see more players walking that line between official union approval and their own personal deals. Keep your eyes peeled, because this isn’t the last we’ll hear about player NIL and brand identity in the league.
This article was created with AI assistance and published under Seattle On Tap’s editorial standards. See our Editorial Policy.
Originally reported by Yahoo Sports.
Leave a Reply