The absolute gut-punch coming with the 24-team College Football Playoff isn’t that we’ll have fewer awesome, meaningful games. Nope, college football is always gonna deliver those must-watch showdowns. The real problem is those crucial, nail-biting games are getting ripped from September, October, and early November, and shoved all the way into late December instead. It’s already killing the vibe of a weekend like this one, with the first CFP rankings laying it all out for us.
Bye-Bye, High Stakes Football!
Think about it. Miami, ranked #1, facing #11 Notre Dame. In a 4-team playoff, Miami is playing for its whole playoff spot. Notre Dame? They’re a spoiler, pure and simple. Switch to a 12-team format, Miami is in regardless, but Notre Dame needs to win out with a loss to even sniff the playoff. Now, let’s look at the impending 24-team playoff: Miami is grabbing a bye either way. Notre Dame is still in the field, just way down deep. Where’s the fire? Where’s the drama? It’s gone.
Same story with #2 Georgia against #10 Ole Miss. Under a 4-team system, a loss for Georgia meant real trouble. Ole Miss had zero hope. With 12 teams, Georgia losing still means they’re in the playoff, probably just without a bye. But with 24 teams? This outstanding game would only be about playoff seeding. Seriously. Just seeding.
“Battle For A Bye” Ain’t No Game of the Century
Remember those games where everything was on the line? That’s what we’re losing. Take #9 BYU at #3 Utah. In a 4-team playoff, a Utah loss put their playoff spot at real risk, and BYU could, maybe, climb into playoff contention with a huge win. Jump to 12 teams, and Utah shrugs off a loss, while BYU is looking at an extremely anxious run to the end of the season. But with 24 teams? This game becomes “The Battle for a Bye.” Does that sound as epic as “Game of the Century”? Not even close.
Or how about #5 Alabama heading to Baton Rouge to face #14 LSU? With a 4-team format, LSU could absolutely detonate Alabama’s playoff hopes. In a 12-team playoff, Alabama could do the same to LSU. What about a 24-team playoff? Both schools are simply… jockeying for seeding. What thrilling stakes, right? It’s a joke!
Meaningless Mid-Rank Mayhem
Even games that used to matter for the bubble teams get neutered. #6 Kentucky against #13 Tennessee. In a 4-team setup, Kentucky needed a massive win to stay in any playoff convo. With 12 teams, Tennessee needs a big win to get back into the playoff conversation. Fast forward to 24 teams: both schools are perfectly fine to stay in the field, no matter what happens. Again, “thrilling stakes” in Knoxville, huh?
Then there’s #7 Texas at #18 Missouri. In a 4-team world, both are out. But in a 12-team playoff, this game is everything: Missouri desperately needs the win, and another Texas loss could lock them out. Under the 24-team setup, maybe Missouri would worry a little with a loss, but probably not. It’s just another example of how the 24-team playoff sucks the meaning out of a truly important game.
Even UCLA, ranked #8, facing Minnesota. With 4 teams, UCLA is probably done with a loss. With 12 teams, a loss here could cause serious problems for UCLA, which makes it a compelling watch. But the 24-team system? Minnesota is 5-3, so a win over #8 UCLA would probably vault them into the low end of the field. UCLA? Totally safe either way. What are we even watching for anymore?
The big picture is clear: the energy, the desperation, the absolute must-win feeling that makes these early season college football Saturdays legendary? That’s all getting pushed to late December. We’re losing the raw, immediate stakes that define these epic matchups. It’s time to get ready for a future where “just jockeying for seeding” is the new “Game of the Century.”
This article was created with AI assistance and published under Seattle On Tap’s editorial standards. See our Editorial Policy.
Originally reported by Yahoo Sports.
Leave a Reply