Seattle sports, on tap daily

The San Francisco Giants Are on the Brink of 100 Losses, and Some of Them Are Saying, ‘What’s the Point?’

San Francisco Giants logo on gradient background

Written by

in

San Francisco Giants logo on gradient background
San Francisco Giants logo on gradient background — Created by the Sports On Tap desk | Source : Sports On Tap (team logos property of their respective owners)

The 2026 San Francisco Giants are staring down a truly brutal milestone: just 19 more losses would make them only the second team in franchise history to hit 100 Ls. It’s a number that feels like a flashing neon sign for all-time failure, but even within the clubhouse, there’s a wild disagreement on whether that three-digit mark actually means anything.

Does 100 Losses Even Matter When You’re Already Out?

This is the central question ripping through the Giants right now. Starter Landen Roupp is clear, saying, “I would say it does. That’s not something we want to do. Regardless of whether we’re in it or not, we still want to win baseball games and compete.” He thinks it’s definitely “a thing that we don’t want to hit.” You feel that, right? Pride in the uniform. But then you hear from shortstop Willy Adames, who’s got a completely different take. “To me, what difference does it make if you lose 95 or 100 games?” he asks. “You’re out of the race, what’s the point of the discussion? I see it as a disappointment either way.” That’s a stark contrast! Are we talking about a symbolic rock bottom, or just more of the same losing?

The “Round Number” That Bites Deep

Despite Adames’s perspective, there’s a strong vibe that 100 just *feels* worse. Outfielder Drew Gilbert put it plainly: “One hundred just looks worse.” Even president of baseball operations Buster Posey admitted it’s a “round number that you want to avoid.” He says losing 98 or 99 might not be a huge difference, but avoiding 100? “Yes. Yeah.” To dodge that bullet, San Francisco needs to win six of their final 24 games. They close out the season on September 27 against the Dodgers at Oracle Park. Considering they’ve already lost 18 games in a month *twice* this season (May and August), going 6-18 isn’t exactly a lock. Manager Tony Vitello summarized it well, stating, “I’ve never been into streaks and those kinds of numbers, but it’s not good.” Reliever Ryan Walker even suggested that obsessing over it might be counterproductive. “You probably don’t want to focus on, ‘Oh, we can’t lose 100!’ If that’s your main priority, it’s going to be hard to win games.”

Rock Bottom and What Comes Next

The fact it’s still even possible to hit 100 losses speaks volumes about the absolute train wreck that has been the 2026 Giants season. They were projected for way better, but their biggest bats went cold early, and a surprisingly good bullpen in April totally tanked. The team never found a rhythm, with offense and pitching never clicking at the same time. Injuries piled up, and they traded six players at the deadline. The real question for the Giants now isn’t just *if* they hit 100, but *what happens next*. Does hitting this symbolic rock bottom force the kind of rebuild or major changes that lead to real progress? The 1985 Giants, another team to flirt with the century mark, eventually brought in top prospect Will Clark, Robby Thompson, and Candy Maldonado. The next year, they won 83 games, a huge 21-game improvement. Maybe a truly miserable year is what’s needed to shake things up. We’ll find out when they wrap things up against the Dodgers.

This article was created with AI assistance and published under Seattle On Tap’s editorial standards. See our Editorial Policy.

Originally reported by Yahoo Sports.

About the author

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *